IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v39y2007i1p162-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

For Gentrification?

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Butler

    (Department of Geography, King's College, London WC2R 2LS, England)

Abstract

In this paper I argue that gentrification, despite the many arguments over its continuing validity as a concept, retains its key importance in understanding processes of class change. For some it is a process of colonising the city, for others a manifestation of belonging; for some the concept can be used as a radical critique of neoliberalism whilst for others this very critique is an exemplar of the hegemonising tendencies amongst (often radical) North American urban scholars. I argue that the concept has grown somewhat middle-aged and overendowed with its own history. I suggest that it needs to retain a focus on the implications of macro social change for individuals and social groups. In particular, gentrification needs to decouple itself from its original association with the deindustrialisation of metropolitan centres such as London and from its associations with working-class displacement. Recently, gentrification has occurred across the spatial scale—in second-order cities and in hitherto suburban locations as well as in the countryside. Processes such as ‘greentrification’, ‘gated communities’, and ‘studentification’ often coexist in quite close proximity to each other; the influence London exerts over the southern half of England is a good example of this. I argue that the concept of gentrification functions as an important way of understanding the mediations between global processes and flows, on the one hand, and the construction of identities in particular localities, on the other. With the decline of social class as providing an overall explanation of cultural, social, and spatial behaviour, this notion of gentrification as a form of ‘elective belonging’ has considerable potential for uniting geographical and sociological approaches to agency and structure. I illustrate this by drawing on three recent studies on the relationship between people and places.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Butler, 2007. "For Gentrification?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(1), pages 162-181, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:1:p:162-181
    DOI: 10.1068/a38472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a38472
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a38472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith Hoggart & Chris Hiscock, 2005. "Occupational Structures in Service-Class Households: Comparisons of Rural, Suburban, and Inner-City Residential Environments," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(1), pages 63-80, January.
    2. Garry Robson & Tim Butler, 2001. "Coming to Terms with London: Middle‐class Communities in a Global City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 70-86, March.
    3. Tim Butler, 2002. "Thinking Global but Acting Local: The Middle Classes in the City," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 7(3), pages 50-68, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Butler, 2003. "Living in the Bubble: Gentrification and its 'Others' in North London," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2469-2486, November.
    2. Keith Hoggart & Chris Hiscock, 2005. "Occupational Structures in Service-Class Households: Comparisons of Rural, Suburban, and Inner-City Residential Environments," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(1), pages 63-80, January.
    3. Chris Hamnett, 2003. "Gentrification and the Middle-class Remaking of Inner London, 1961-2001," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2401-2426, November.
    4. Tim Butler, 2007. "Re‐urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 759-781, December.
    5. Tom Slater & Winifred Curran & Loretta Lees, 2004. "Guest Editorial," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(7), pages 1141-1150, July.
    6. Antoine Paccoud, 2017. "Buy-to-let gentrification: Extending social change through tenure shifts," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 839-856, April.
    7. Loretta Lees, 2003. "Super-gentrification: The Case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2487-2509, November.
    8. Ayo Mansaray, 2018. "Complicity and contestation in the gentrifying urban primary school," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(14), pages 3076-3091, November.
    9. Kim Allen & Sumi Hollingworth, 2013. "‘Sticky Subjects’ or ‘Cosmopolitan Creatives’? Social Class, Place and Urban Young People’s Aspirations for Work in the Knowledge Economy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(3), pages 499-517, February.
    10. Vijayta Doshi, 2021. "Symbolic violence in embodying customer service work across the urban/rural divide," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 39-53, January.
    11. Diane Reay, 2007. "'Unruly Places' : Inner-city Comprehensives, Middle-class Imaginaries and Working-class Children," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(7), pages 1191-1201, June.
    12. Tim Butler & Garry Robson, 2001. "Social Capital, Gentrification and Neighbourhood Change in London: A Comparison of Three South London Neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(12), pages 2145-2162, November.
    13. Michaela Benson, 2014. "Trajectories of middle-class belonging: The dynamics of place attachment and classed identities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(14), pages 3097-3112, November.
    14. Tim Butler, 2002. "Thinking Global but Acting Local: The Middle Classes in the City," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 7(3), pages 50-68, August.
    15. Gary Bridge & Tim Butler & Patrick Le Galès, 2014. "Power Relations and Social Mix in Metropolitan Neighbourhoods in North America and Europe: Moving Beyond Gentrification?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1133-1141, July.
    16. Darren P Smith & Louise Holt, 2007. "Studentification and ‘Apprentice’ Gentrifiers within Britain's Provincial Towns and Cities: Extending the Meaning of Gentrification," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(1), pages 142-161, January.
    17. Alan Walks & Martine August, 2008. "The Factors Inhibiting Gentrification in Areas with Little Non-market Housing: Policy Lessons from the Toronto Experience," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2594-2625, November.
    18. Emma Jackson & Tim Butler, 2015. "Revisiting ‘social tectonics’: The middle classes and social mix in gentrifying neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(13), pages 2349-2365, October.
    19. Mark Davidson & Loretta Lees, 2005. "New-Build ‘Gentrification’ and London's Riverside Renaissance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(7), pages 1165-1190, July.
    20. Stephen John Ball & Carol Vincent, 2007. "Education, Class Fractions and the Local Rules of Spatial Relations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(7), pages 1175-1189, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:1:p:162-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.