IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v37y2005i9p1589-1611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Community? Reading Difference and Singularity with Community

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Panelli
  • Richard Welch

Abstract

Geographers have increasingly recognised that communities are not homogeneous social formations but contain great diversity and are meaningful in a variety of material, relational and political ways. This has resulted in the apparently contradictory notion of “community with difference†; that community may be performed even while heterogeneity and disagreement are present. But geographers have yet to address satisfactorily the question of why communities continue to be the subject of fascination and study when attempts at definition have proved so problematic. Following on from Young's critique of community, this paper first engages the work of Nancy and Secomb to consider Nancy's conceptualisation of ‘singularity’ as a way to explain the human construction of—and possible need for—notions of community. In short we address the why community? question. Using a rural Australian case study, we demonstrate that meanings of community reflect many differences. This case also illustrates the role of human singularity in the negotiation of these differences, defining the manner in which individual perspectives of community are articulated as well as underpinning people's responses and struggles when ideas of community are challenged.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Panelli & Richard Welch, 2005. "Why Community? Reading Difference and Singularity with Community," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(9), pages 1589-1611, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:37:y:2005:i:9:p:1589-1611
    DOI: 10.1068/a37257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a37257
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a37257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S A Radcliffe, 1999. "Reimagining the Nation: Community, Difference, and National Identities among Indigenous and Mestizo Provincials in Ecuador," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(1), pages 37-52, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gradon Diprose, 2016. "Negotiating interdependence and anxiety in community economies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(7), pages 1411-1427, July.
    2. Robyn Mayes & Paula McDonald & Barbara Pini, 2014. "‘Our’ Community: Corporate Social Responsibility, Neoliberalisation, and Mining Industry Community Engagement in Rural Australia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(2), pages 398-413, February.
    3. Jennifer C Rogers & Eunice A Simmons & Ian Convery & Andrew Weatherall, 2012. "What factors enable community leadership of renewable energy projects? Lessons from a woodfuel heating initiative," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(2), pages 209-222, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gradon Diprose, 2016. "Negotiating interdependence and anxiety in community economies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(7), pages 1411-1427, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:37:y:2005:i:9:p:1589-1611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.