IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v36y2004i3p461-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reembracing Metaphysics

Author

Listed:
  • Mitch Rose

    (School of Geography, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England)

Abstract

The following thought piece addresses the issue ‘what next’ by considering the effects of poststructural thought on the field. Specifically, I argue that poststructuralism has emerged in the field as a problem that a number of geographers have endeavoured to solve by devising new theoretical frameworks and innovative methodological principles, the purpose of which is to make social science ‘better’. In response I suggest that the problems posed by poststructuralism are fundamentally unanswerable and that they are meant to be recognised rather than resolved. While poststructuralism effectively reveals the limits of social science, it should not seduce us into thinking we can somehow do social science differently. This is because social science always involves doing some kind of metaphysics–that is, the practice of determining, delimiting, representing, and explaining how the world works. The goal of this paper is to discuss the relationship between metaphysics and deconstruction as an ontological condition that cannot be surmounted through study or thought. I conclude by suggesting that the goal of social science should not be to get around this relationship but rather to embrace it as a fundamental aspect of what we as geographers, social scientists, and human beings do.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitch Rose, 2004. "Reembracing Metaphysics," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(3), pages 461-468, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:3:p:461-468
    DOI: 10.1068/a3655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a3655
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a3655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D P Dixon & J P Jones III, 1998. "My Dinner with Derrida, or Spatial Analysis and Poststructuralism Do Lunch," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(2), pages 247-260, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberts, Susan M. & Jones III, John Paul & Frohling, Oliver, 2005. "NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1845-1864, November.
    2. Larry Knopp & Michael Brown, 2021. "Travel guides, urban spatial imaginaries and LGBTQ+ activism: The case of Damron guides," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(7), pages 1380-1396, May.
    3. Michael Brown & Travis Colton, 2001. "Dying Epistemologies: An Analysis of Home Death and its Critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(5), pages 799-821, May.
    4. Marianna Pavlovskaya, 2006. "Theorizing with GIS: A Tool for Critical Geographies?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(11), pages 2003-2020, November.
    5. Jairus Rossi, 2013. "The Socionatural Engineering of Reductionist Metaphors: A Political Ecology of Synthetic Biology," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(5), pages 1127-1143, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:3:p:461-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.