IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v23y1991i9p1279-1300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Structure and Spatial Interaction: A Simulation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • L Lo

    (Department of Geography, York University, North York, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada)

Abstract

In this paper, variations in the impedance parameter of the conventional spatial interaction models are examined in a quasi-empirical manner. In a previous paper, a spatial demand model based on the translog indirect utility function was simulated to provide interaction data. If the inputs to the translog demand model are varied systematically, the impedance parameter estimates for both models also vary systematically. In general, the impedance parameter becomes less negative as the set of destinations becomes more dispersed, as relative size among the origins and the destinations becomes more varied, and, in particular, as fewer destinations become substitutable or the degree of substitutability decreases. Meanwhile, model performance also deteriorates. The need for skepticism regarding model transferability and parameter interpretation is confirmed, and the possibility of ever correctly specifying the models is questioned.

Suggested Citation

  • L Lo, 1991. "Spatial Structure and Spatial Interaction: A Simulation Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 23(9), pages 1279-1300, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:23:y:1991:i:9:p:1279-1300
    DOI: 10.1068/a231279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a231279
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a231279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas F. Golob & Richard L. Gustafson & Martin J. Beckmann, 1973. "An Economic Utility Theory Approach To Spatial Interaction," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 159-182, January.
    2. Borgers, Aloys & Timmermans, Harry, 1987. "Choice model specification, substitution and spatial structure effects : A simulation experiment," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 29-47, February.
    3. Choukroun, Jean-Marc, 1975. "A general framework for the development of gravity-type trip distribution models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 177-202, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martínez, L. Miguel & Viegas, José Manuel, 2013. "A new approach to modelling distance-decay functions for accessibility assessment in transport studies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 87-96.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Cheng & Yuxia Lv & Mark Rosenberg & Linke Hou, 2018. "Decision Making of Non-Agricultural Work by Rural Residents in Weifang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    2. T E Smith, 1976. "A Spatial-Discounting Theory of Interaction Preferences," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 8(8), pages 879-915, December.
    3. C S Tapiero, 1980. "A Probability Model for the Effects of Distance on the Demand for Multiple Facilities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 12(4), pages 399-408, April.
    4. L Lo, 1992. "Destination Interdependence and the Competing-Destinations Model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(8), pages 1191-1204, August.
    5. T.A. Arentze & H.J.P. Timmermans, 2005. "An Analysis of Context and Constraints-dependent Shopping Behaviour Using Qualitative Decision Principles," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(3), pages 435-448, March.
    6. G Leonardi & Y Y Papageorgiou, 1992. "Conceptual Foundations of Spatial Choice Models," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(10), pages 1393-1408, October.
    7. González-Benito, Óscar & Santos-Requejo, Libia, 2002. "A comparison of approaches to exploit budget allocation data in cross-sectional maximum likelihood estimation of multi-attribute choice models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 315-324, October.
    8. Ian Gordon, 2013. "Ian Molho (1986) Theories of Migration: A Review – Commentary to Accompany Republished Version in Scottish Journal of Political Economy Jubilee Issue," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 60(5), pages 557-559, November.
    9. Mengyao Ren & Yaoyu Lin & Meihan Jin & Zhongyuan Duan & Yongxi Gong & Yu Liu, 2020. "Examining the effect of land-use function complementarity on intra-urban spatial interactions using metro smart card records," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1607-1629, August.
    10. Jacob J de Vries & Peter Nijkamp & Piet Rietveld, 2009. "Exponential or Power Distance-Decay for Commuting? An Alternative Specification," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(2), pages 461-480, February.
    11. T J Fik & R G Amey & G F Mulligan, 1992. "Labor Migration Amongst Hierarchically Competing and Intervening Origins and Destinations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(9), pages 1271-1290, September.
    12. Ian Molho, 2013. "Theories of Migration: A Review," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 60(5), pages 526-556, November.
    13. repec:elg:eechap:14395_2 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Fischer, Manfred M. & Essletzbichler, Jürgen & Gassler, Helmut & Trichtl, Gerhard, 1992. "Interregional and International Telephone Communication. Aggregate Traffic Model and Empirical Evidence for Austria," MPRA Paper 78266, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Eymann, Angelika & Ronning, Gerd, 1996. "Microeconometric models of tourists' destination choise," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 84, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    16. Eymann, Angelika & Ronning, Gerd, 1997. "Microeconometric models of tourists' destination choice," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 735-761, November.
    17. Aurélie Mercier & Stéphanie Souche‐Le Corvec & Nicolas Ovtracht, 2021. "Measure of accessibility to postal services in France: A potential spatial accessibility approach applied in an urban region," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 227-249, February.
    18. Pramono, Ari & Oppewal, Harmen, 2021. "Where to refuel: Modeling on-the-way choice of convenience outlet," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Kingsley E. Haynes & Stewart Fotheringham, 1990. "The Impact of Space on the Application Of Discrete Choice Models," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 20(2), pages 39-49, Spring.
    20. Swoboda, Bernhard & Berg, Bettina & Schramm-Klein, Hanna & Foscht, Thomas, 2013. "The importance of retail brand equity and store accessibility for store loyalty in local competition," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 251-262.
    21. De Valck, Jeremy & Broekx, Steven & Liekens, Inge & Aertsens, Joris & Vranken, Liesbet, 2014. "Testing the influence of substitutes in nature valuation by using spatial discounting factors," Working Papers 182808, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:23:y:1991:i:9:p:1279-1300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.