IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/entthe/v49y2025i1p283-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taking a Second Look at the Bait: Attention to Upside Potential Versus Downside Risk in Venture Capitalists’ Staged Investment

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Hao
  • Yanan Feng
  • Hongbin Tan
  • Mingzhu Ye

Abstract

This study investigates how venture capitalists (VCs) balance upside potential and downside risk across investment stages. Drawing on the attention-based view, we propose a situated attention mechanism—that is, the investment stage represents a situational consideration affecting VC’s attention allocation to different risk dimensions. We argue that varying staging situations drive VCs to prioritize upside potential in the initial stage yet downside risk in the subsequent stage. As such, VCs may initially favor a risky project, but subsequently devalue it. We further propose that these effects are contingent on number of VCs on market, start-up maturity, and VC attention constraints. Our empirical results support our predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Hao & Yanan Feng & Hongbin Tan & Mingzhu Ye, 2025. "Taking a Second Look at the Bait: Attention to Upside Potential Versus Downside Risk in Venture Capitalists’ Staged Investment," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 49(1), pages 283-311, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:49:y:2025:i:1:p:283-311
    DOI: 10.1177/10422587241270571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10422587241270571
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10422587241270571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:49:y:2025:i:1:p:283-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.