IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/entthe/v48y2024i2p506-546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benevolent Sexism and the Gender Gap in Startup Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Nhu Nguyen
  • Ivona Hideg
  • Yuval Engel
  • Frédéric Godart

Abstract

Women-led startups are evaluated less favorably than men-led startups, but the reasons for this require further investigation. Drawing on ambivalent sexism theory, we posit that benevolent sexism undermines gender equity in startup evaluation. We initially expected benevolent sexism to be negatively related to evaluations of women-led startups. Surprisingly, we found that benevolent sexism is unrelated to evaluations of women-led startups but is positively related to those of men-led startups—a finding that was replicated in two additional studies. Our work demonstrates benevolent sexism as an advantaging mechanism of inequity in entrepreneurship that boosts men’s outcomes without directly harming women’s outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nhu Nguyen & Ivona Hideg & Yuval Engel & Frédéric Godart, 2024. "Benevolent Sexism and the Gender Gap in Startup Evaluation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(2), pages 506-546, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:48:y:2024:i:2:p:506-546
    DOI: 10.1177/10422587231178865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10422587231178865
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10422587231178865?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:48:y:2024:i:2:p:506-546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.