IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/entthe/v47y2023i1p113-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There Opportunity Without Stakeholders? A Stakeholder Theory Critique and Development of Opportunity-Actualization

Author

Listed:
  • Stratos Ramoglou
  • Stelios Zyglidopoulos
  • Foteini Papadopoulou

Abstract

How can stakeholder theory contribute to opportunity theory? We suggest that stakeholder theory affords appropriate theoretical lenses for grounding the opportunity-actualization perspective more firmly within the real-world constraints of business venturing. Actualization departs from a strong focus on entrepreneurial agency to conceptualize how pre-existing environmental conditions determine what entrepreneurial action can achieve. We explain that stakeholder theory can strengthen the outward-looking orientation of actualization by (1) bringing the entirety of stakeholders centre-stage, beyond a narrow focus on market stakeholders, and (2) stressing the importance of noneconomic considerations for the actualization of economic opportunities. Our theorization culminates in the concept of ‘strategic opportunity thinking’ (SOT). We conceptualize SOT as a way of protecting entrepreneurs from the blind-to-stakeholders mindset that either sleepwalks them into the territory of non-opportunity or prevents them from the actualization of real yet difficult-to-actualize opportunities in the absence of stakeholder-centric thinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Stratos Ramoglou & Stelios Zyglidopoulos & Foteini Papadopoulou, 2023. "Is There Opportunity Without Stakeholders? A Stakeholder Theory Critique and Development of Opportunity-Actualization," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(1), pages 113-141, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:47:y:2023:i:1:p:113-141
    DOI: 10.1177/10422587211043354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10422587211043354
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10422587211043354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:47:y:2023:i:1:p:113-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.