IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/entthe/v21y1997i3p55-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Family Firm's Exclusion from Business School Research: Explaining the Void; Addressing the Opportunity

Author

Listed:
  • Reginald A. Litz

Abstract

Why does the vast majority of business school research either ignore, or at best, gloss over the role of family in owning or managing business enterprises? This paper addresses this question and contemplates how the gap might be remedied. It begins by reviewing recent definitional work on the family firm in order to chart the parameters of the family business construct. It then proceeds to describe the nature of, and interaction patterns that have evolved between family firms, privately held corporations, faculties of business, and business school researchers seeking job security offered by tenure. The paper concludes by offering recommendations for addressing the family business research lacuna. The first recommendation focuses on rethinking the grounding assumptions that have undergirded much traditional organizational research. The second suggestion deals with methodological issues and recommends the patient nurture of long-term, mutually beneficial linkages with family firms that might facilitate in-depth longitudinal inquiry.

Suggested Citation

  • Reginald A. Litz, 1997. "The Family Firm's Exclusion from Business School Research: Explaining the Void; Addressing the Opportunity," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 21(3), pages 55-71, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:21:y:1997:i:3:p:55-71
    DOI: 10.1177/104225879702100304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/104225879702100304
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/104225879702100304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tootelian, Dennis H. & Gaedeke, Ralph M., 1987. "Fortune 500 list revisited 12 years later: Still an endangered species for academic research?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 359-363, August.
    2. Gregory G. Dess & Richard B. Robinson, 1984. "Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 265-273, July.
    3. Frank Hoy & Trudy G. Verser, 1994. "Emerging Business, Emerging Field: Entrepreneurship and the Family Firm," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(1), pages 9-23, October.
    4. Neil C. Churchill & Kenneth J. Hatten, 1987. "Non-Market-Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework for Family Businesses," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 12(2), pages 53-66, October.
    5. Gaedeke, Ralph M. & Tootelian, Dennis H., 1976. "The fortune "500" list-An endangered species for academic research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 283-288, August.
    6. Alan L. Carsrud, 1994. "Meanderings of a Resurrected Psychologist or, Lessons Learned in Creating a Family Business Program," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(1), pages 39-48, October.
    7. Fama, Eugene F, 1980. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(2), pages 288-307, April.
    8. W. Gibb Dyer Jr. & Wendy Handler, 1994. "Entrepreneurship and Family Business: Exploring the Connections," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(1), pages 71-83, October.
    9. Balaji S. Chakravarthy, 1986. "Measuring strategic performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(5), pages 437-458, September.
    10. Babbage, Charles, 1832. "Economy of Machinery and Manufactures," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number babbage1832.
    11. Jay B. Barney & Mark H. Hansen, 1994. "Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S1), pages 175-190, December.
    12. Yakov Amihud & Baruch Lev, 1981. "Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 12(2), pages 605-617, Autumn.
    13. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    14. Taylor, Frederick Winslow, 1911. "The Principles of Scientific Management," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number taylor1911.
    15. Robert H. Brockhaus Sr., 1994. "Entrepreneurship and Family Business Research: Comparisons, Critique, and Lessons," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(1), pages 25-38, October.
    16. Wendy C. Handler, 1990. "Succession in Family Firms: A Mutual Role Adjustment between Entrepreneur and Next-generation Family Members," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 15(1), pages 37-52, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Westhead & Marc Cowling, 1998. "Family Firm Research: The Need for a Methodological Rethink," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(1), pages 31-56, October.
    2. Mark K. Fiegener & Bonnie M. Brown & Dirk R. Dreux IV & William J. Dennis Jr., 2000. "CEO Stakes and Board Composition in Small Private Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(4), pages 5-24, July.
    3. Eugenio Zubeltzu-Jaka & Eduardo Ortas & Igor Álvarez-Etxeberria, 2019. "Independent Directors and Organizational Performance: New Evidence from A Meta-Analytic Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Dean A. Shepherd & Andrew Zacharakis, 2000. "Structuring Family Business Succession: An Analysis of the Future Leader's Decision Making," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(4), pages 25-39, July.
    5. William S. Schulze & Michael H. Lubatkin & Richard N. Dino & Ann K. Buchholtz, 2001. "Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 99-116, April.
    6. Sue Birley, 2002. "Attitudes of Owner-Managers' Children towards Family and Business Issues," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 26(3), pages 5-19, April.
    7. Schulze, William S. & Lubatkin, Michael H. & Dino, Richard N., 2003. "Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 473-490, July.
    8. Andrea Calabrò & Donata Mussolino, 2013. "How do boards of directors contribute to family SME export intensity? The role of formal and informal governance mechanisms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(2), pages 363-403, May.
    9. Thierry Poulain-Rehm, 2006. "Qu'est-ce qu'une entreprise familiale?," Post-Print hal-01430990, HAL.
    10. Morris, Michael H. & Williams, Roy O. & Allen, Jeffrey A. & Avila, Ramon A., 1997. "Correlates of success in family business transitions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 385-401, September.
    11. Renneboog, L.D.R. & Szilagyi, P.G., 2006. "Corporate Restructuring and Bondholder Wealth," Other publications TiSEM 760257ae-6086-414d-9ace-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Agarwal, Vikas & Daniel, Naveen D. & Naik, Narayan Y., 2009. "Role of managerial incentives and discretion in hedge fund performance," CFR Working Papers 04-04, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    13. Chris Carr & Suzanne Bateman, 2009. "International Strategy Configurations of the World’s Top Family Firms," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 733-758, December.
    14. Renneboog, L.D.R. & Szilagyi, P.G., 2006. "Corporate Restructuring and Bondholder Wealth," Other publications TiSEM 65f6d007-95f0-427f-8922-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Adetoun Adedotun Amubode & Hassanat Motunrayo Rauf-Lawal & Boiso Maria Owodiong-Idemeko, 2016. "Attitude of Couples and Marrigeable Singles in Establishing Joint Fashion Business," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(1), pages 192-205, March.
    16. Boubaker, Sabri & Chebbi, Kaouther & Grira, Jocelyn, 2020. "Top management inside debt and corporate social responsibility? Evidence from the US," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 98-115.
    17. repec:asi:ajoerj:2014:p:468-487 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Veliyath, Rajaram & Ferris, Stephen P., 1997. "Agency influences on risk reduction and operating performance: An empirical investigation among strategic groups," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 219-230, July.
    19. Gammelgaard, Jens, 1999. "Competence: A Dynamic Extension of the Existing Typology of Acquisition Motives," Working Papers 12-1999, Copenhagen Business School, Department of International Economics and Management.
    20. César Camisón-Zornoza & Beatriz Forés-Julián & Alba Puig-Denia & Sergio Camisón-Haba, 0. "Effects of ownership structure and corporate and family governance on dynamic capabilities in family firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-34.
    21. Danijela Miloš Sprčić & Metka Tekavčič & Željko Šević, 2008. "A Review of the Rationales for Corporate Risk Management: Fashion or the Need?," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 1(1), pages 71-99, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:21:y:1997:i:3:p:55-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.