IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v9y1998i3p235-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Plugged the Gap? Re-Examining The Woodfuel Crisis in Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • P.N. Bradley
  • B.M. Campbell

Abstract

The woodfuel gap theory emerged in the 1980s and gave rise to a development push which targeted aid towards woodfuel production and the alleviation of the woodfuel crisis. A close inspection of the situation in Zimbabwe indicates that gap theory fails to encompass the dynamics of rural production, wood use and management, or deforestation. It provided a poor basis for the Rural Afforestation Programme, which ultimately failed to identify and address woodfuel problems. It is argued that woodfuel problems are localised, complex in their origins and dynamics; and collectively do not amount to a woodfuel “crisis†. Woodfuel shortages are not necessarily linked to deforestation, nor can they be addressed simply by planting trees. Gap theory simplifies and obscures the individuality of woodfuel supply and demand balances and should be abandoned.

Suggested Citation

  • P.N. Bradley & B.M. Campbell, 1998. "Who Plugged the Gap? Re-Examining The Woodfuel Crisis in Zimbabwe," Energy & Environment, , vol. 9(3), pages 235-255, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:9:y:1998:i:3:p:235-255
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X9800900302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X9800900302
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X9800900302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Campbell, B. M. & Vermeulen, S. J. & Mangono, J. J. & Mabugu, R., 2003. "The energy transition in action: urban domestic fuel choices in a changing Zimbabwe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 553-562, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:9:y:1998:i:3:p:235-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.