IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v8y1997i2p81-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Win-Win Strategy for Economic Wealth and Climate Protection – Equally Important for the First and the Third World

Author

Listed:
  • Wilfrid Bach

Abstract

Reduction targets for a desired degree of climate protection are negotiated at the international circuit. Concrete measures for reaching such targets are implemented at the national and city levels. Demonstrated here for electricity use in the commercial sector of the City of Muenster is a “Win-Win Strategy†which, if correctly done will result only in winners. Specifically, it is shown that electricity use between 1990 and 2005 in a Trend Scenario would increase by ca. 25 %, while in the Climate Protection Scenario it could decrease by ca. 23 % due to savings and substitution measures. The benefits, costs, and net gains are computed for different price developments. For a favored variant, the net gain to customers is ca. 66 M DM and that of the city utility – acting as an investor/contractor – is ca. 44 M DM over the period 1996–2021. The monetary savings are calculated by individual uses and user categories. The calculated benefit-loss developments show favorable payback times ranging from 11 to 14 years for the total commercial sector or 2 to 5 years for individual objects. Rough estimates show that over the next 10 years the “Win Win Strategy†could provide 256 additional jobs in the commercial electricity sector of Muenster, and about 700 000 new jobs when projected for Germany as a whole. Additionally, studies show that implementing the electricity efficiency potential in five Western European countries by 2020 could save between 20 and 50 Bil.(billion) ECU, whilst the need for some 90 additional 1000 MW power plants could be avoided. If current commercially available efficiency technologies were used to reach a standard of living equal to that in W. Europe in the late 1970s, the Third World final energy demand would be ca. 1 kW/cap, and in the First World perhaps a little greater. The energetic limit of the ecosphere is estimated to be ca. 1.5 kW/cap at the current world population. Finally, the policy options discussed here can help tap this huge available energy efficiency gold mine by the North and the South alike. The function of the “Win Win Strategy†is to help supply the funds for paving the way toward a sustainable future.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilfrid Bach, 1997. "A Win-Win Strategy for Economic Wealth and Climate Protection – Equally Important for the First and the Third World," Energy & Environment, , vol. 8(2), pages 81-101, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:81-101
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X9700800201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X9700800201
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X9700800201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Redclift, Michael, 1994. "Sustainable energy policies for the Brazilian Amazon," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 427-431, May.
    2. De Martino Jannuzzi, Gilberto & Schipper, Lee, 1991. "The structure of electricity demand in the Brazilian household sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(9), pages 879-891, November.
    3. Geller, Howard S. & Goldemberg, José & Roberto Moreira, José & Hukai, Roberto & Scarpinella, Claudio & Ysohizawa, Mamiro, 1988. "Electricity conservation in Brazil: Potential and progress," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 469-483.
    4. Graca, Gilena M. G. & Ketoff, Andrea N., 1991. "CO2 savings in Brazil : The importance of a small contribution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(10), pages 1003-1010, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gholami, M. & Barbaresi, A. & Torreggiani, D. & Tassinari, P., 2020. "Upscaling of spatial energy planning, phases, methods, and techniques: A systematic review through meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Ghisi, Enedir & Gosch, Samuel & Lamberts, Roberto, 2007. "Electricity end-uses in the residential sector of Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4107-4120, August.
    3. Bahman Huseynli, 2023. "Effect of Exports of Goods and Services and Energy Consumption in Italy`s Service Sector," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 254-261, May.
    4. Velasquez, Carlos E. & Zocatelli, Matheus & Estanislau, Fidellis B.G.L. & Castro, Victor F., 2022. "Analysis of time series models for Brazilian electricity demand forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    5. Pereira Uhr, Daniel de Abreu & Squarize Chagas, André Luis & Ziero Uhr, Júlia Gallego, 2019. "Estimation of elasticities for electricity demand in Brazilian households and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 69-79.
    6. Geller, Howard & Jannuzzi, Gilberto de Martino & Schaeffer, Roberto & Tolmasquim, Mauricio Tiomno, 1998. "The efficient use of electricity in Brazil: progress and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(11), pages 859-872, September.
    7. World Bank, 2011. "A New Slant on Slopes : Measuring the Benefits of Increased Electricity Access in Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Reports 2742, The World Bank Group.
    8. Villareal, Maria José Charfuelan & Moreira, João Manoel Losada, 2016. "Household consumption of electricity in Brazil between 1985 and 2013," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 251-259.
    9. Mendes, Carlos André B. & Beluco, Alexandre & Canales, Fausto Alfredo, 2017. "Some important uncertainties related to climate change in projections for the Brazilian hydropower expansion in the Amazon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 123-138.
    10. Shoaib Ahmed Khatri & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Khanji Harijan & Mohammad Aslam Uqaili & Syed Feroz Shah & Pervez Hameed Shaikh & Laveet Kumar, 2022. "An Overview of the Current Energy Situation of Pakistan and the Way Forward towards Green Energy Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Daniel de Abreu Pereira Uhr & Júlia Gallego Ziero Uhr, André Luis Squarize Chagas, 2017. "Estimation of price and income elasticities for the Brazilian household electricity demand," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2017_12, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    12. Krzysztof Gajowniczek & Tomasz Ząbkowski, 2017. "Two-Stage Electricity Demand Modeling Using Machine Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Levine, Mark D & Price, Lynn & Martin, Nathan, 1996. "Mitigation options for carbon dioxide emissions from buildings : A global analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(10-11), pages 937-949.
    14. Freund, Caroline L. & Wallich, Christine I., 1995. "Raising household energy prices in Poland : who gains? who loses?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1495, The World Bank.
    15. Gang Du & Chuanwang Sun, 2015. "Determinants of Electricity Demand in Nonmetallic Mineral Products Industry: Evidence from a Comparative Study of Japan and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-25, June.
    16. Coelho, Suani Teixeira & Sanches-Pereira, Alessandro & Tudeschini, Luís Gustavo & Goldemberg, José, 2018. "The energy transition history of fuelwood replacement for liquefied petroleum gas in Brazilian households from 1920 to 2016," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 41-52.
    17. Bianco, Vincenzo & Manca, Oronzio & Nardini, Sergio, 2009. "Electricity consumption forecasting in Italy using linear regression models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1413-1421.
    18. Suganthi, L. & Samuel, Anand A., 2012. "Energy models for demand forecasting—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1223-1240.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:81-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.