IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v7y1996i3p239-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risks of Seven UK Electricity Generation Options Part II: The Risk of Large-Scale Accidents

Author

Listed:
  • L.E.J. Roberts
  • D.J. Ball

Abstract

Large-scale accidents cause great social disruption and public alarm and the risks of such accidents must be considered together with those arising during normal operation (Ball and Roberts, 1995). The record of severe accidents in the technologies that contribute to electricity generation is summarised; the UK figures compare favourably with the average in the world. Since such events are rare, future risks have to be assessed by applying the methods of risk analysis to individual installations. Risks of severe accidents should reduce further as modern methods of risk analysis and safety management are developed and applied.

Suggested Citation

  • L.E.J. Roberts & D.J. Ball, 1996. "Risks of Seven UK Electricity Generation Options Part II: The Risk of Large-Scale Accidents," Energy & Environment, , vol. 7(3), pages 239-252, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:7:y:1996:i:3:p:239-252
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X9600700301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X9600700301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X9600700301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clifton, J.J., 1992. "Chapter 2: The historical record of major accidents in the energy industries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 17-32.
    2. Marshall, V.C., 1992. "Chapter 4: The management of hazard and risk," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 63-85.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David J Ball & Laurence Golob, 1999. "Diverse conceptions of risk prioritization," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 243-261, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burgherr, Peter & Hirschberg, Stefan, 2008. "Severe accident risks in fossil energy chains: A comparative analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 538-553.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:7:y:1996:i:3:p:239-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.