IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v36y2025i2p936-957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy regulation, energy innovation, and carbon intensity nexus in China: A nonlinear perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Yanzhe
  • Sana Ullah

Abstract

Considering the role of energy regulations and innovations in reducing energy-driven emissions, our main objective is to scrutinize the influence of energy regulations and innovations on carbon intensity in China over the period 1991–2020. In contrast to the previous studies, the analysis also focuses on the asymmetry assumption. The scientific value added to this study lies in its innovative methods and empirical evidence. The autoregressive distributed lag model, both linear and nonlinear, is utilized in the research to examine the short- and long-run estimates. The linear model highlights that energy regulations, energy innovations, and human capital reduce carbon intensity in the long run, while per capita income and financial development escalate it. However, only energy regulations and human capital help reduce carbon intensity in the short term. In the nonlinear models, the positive shock in environmental regulations reduces carbon intensity in short and long run. Conversely, the positive shock in energy innovations reduces carbon intensity in the long run. Negative shocks in energy regulations and innovations have a statistically insignificant impact on carbon intensity in both the short and long term. In addition, per capita income and financial development only increase carbon intensity in the long run, while human capital reduces carbon intensity in the short run. These findings advocate for implementing heavy energy taxes on firms and industries that rely heavily on fossil fuels. Increasing investment in green energy innovations is the need of the hour in lowering carbon intensity in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Yanzhe & Sana Ullah, 2025. "Energy regulation, energy innovation, and carbon intensity nexus in China: A nonlinear perspective," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(2), pages 936-957, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:936-957
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X231188745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X231188745
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X231188745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:936-957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.