IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v36y2025i1p356-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-label knowledge versus environmental concern toward consumer's switching intentions for electric vehicles: A roadmap toward green innovation and environmental sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Wanli Fang
  • Yongrong Xin
  • Zhenhua Zhang

Abstract

The Chinese authorities firmly encourage the use of electric cars to decrease global pollution and fossil fuel consumption (electric vehicles). Nevertheless, research aimed at determining customers’ switching intentions toward electric vehicles and pro-environmental behavior are scarce in the country. The purpose of this study is to fill the knowledge gap by scrutinizing the linkage among general environmental knowledge, environmental concern, eco-label knowledge, eco-label attitude (ATT), switching intentions(SIN), and pro-environmental behavior that might affect customers’ SIN and PEB in the Chinese context. The present research has additionally improved the theoretical foundation of the Theory of Planned Behavior by adding three new aspects in along with the ongoing customers’ motive elements (eco-label knowledge, general environmental knowledge, and ATT). In a survey, 549 electric vehicle users in China were polled and their data were analyzed. The structural equation modeling method is used to assess theories that have been put forth. According to empirical evidence, general environmental knowledge, environmental concern, and eco-label knowledge have a favorable and substantial impact on ATT. In a similar vein, ATT has a positive impact on consumers’ SIN and PEB. The research adds to the field of study on renewable buying behavior and offers crucial and practical future paths for researchers and professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanli Fang & Yongrong Xin & Zhenhua Zhang, 2025. "Eco-label knowledge versus environmental concern toward consumer's switching intentions for electric vehicles: A roadmap toward green innovation and environmental sustainability," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(1), pages 356-373, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:1:p:356-373
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X231177735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X231177735
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X231177735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:1:p:356-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.