IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v34y2023i6p1884-1909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the asymmetric link between clean energy intensity and carbon dioxide emissions: The significance of quantile-on-quantile method

Author

Listed:
  • Farrukh Shahzad
  • Zeeshan Fareed
  • Yong Wan
  • Yihan Wang
  • Zohaib Zahid
  • Muhammad Irfan

Abstract

This study corroborates the asymmetric and heterogeneous associations between clean energy intensity (CEI) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions among the world's top ten renewable energy consumer countries using quarterly data from 1970Q1 to 2018Q4. We quantify the complete dependence structure between CEI and CO 2 at quantile distributions using a novel quantile-on-quantile (QQ) method proposed by Sim and Zhou (2015). Compared to classic approaches such as quantile regression and ordinary least squares, the QQ technique can provide more information on the overall relationship between CEI and CO 2 . Furthermore, we also seek to determine causal relationships between CEI and CO 2 using a quantile Granger causality approach suggested by Troster. According to our empirical evidence, the link between the two variables is predominantly negative. Moreover, there are significant disparities across countries in the quantile ranges of CEI and CO 2 . In particular, there is a weak positive link between CEI and CO 2 in the case of Sweden, Italy, Japan, and Australia, which may be because CEI has a minimal direct influence on CO 2 in these countries. The empirical findings clarify that policymakers should fund renewable energy industries to minimize carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions and achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Suggested Citation

  • Farrukh Shahzad & Zeeshan Fareed & Yong Wan & Yihan Wang & Zohaib Zahid & Muhammad Irfan, 2023. "Examining the asymmetric link between clean energy intensity and carbon dioxide emissions: The significance of quantile-on-quantile method," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(6), pages 1884-1909, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:34:y:2023:i:6:p:1884-1909
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X221102049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X221102049
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X221102049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:34:y:2023:i:6:p:1884-1909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.