IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v18y2007i5p533-548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hot Planet, Cold Wars

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas M. Kane

    (Department of Politics, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK)

Abstract

Shared challenges can bring out the best in people, but they can also do the opposite. Global climate change is an archetypal shared challenge for humanity, and although the threat has inspired a substantial amount of international co-operation, efforts to moderate it have already proven divisive. These divisions go beyond economically-driven haggling over who must reduce greenhouse gas emissions by what amount. Attempts to mitigate human civilisation's effects on the climate raise questions of political principle. Moreover, these questions have the specific potential to mobilise certain states and quasi-states against certain other ones, and this has implications for the field of security studies. Thus, climate change threatens to revive ideological dispute among armed, organised economically-developed societies. Although the idea of a world war over carbon remains far-fetched, the parallels with the international politics of the mid–20th century are disturbing. Policymakers would be wise to take the political questions of climate change more seriously than they appear to have done in the past. Scholars may note that disputes over global warming challenge influential models of contemporary global politics. This paper explores the reasons why controversies over climate policy are likely to prove particularly divisive in international politics. The first section discusses the relative ideological consensus that has prevailed among developed societies since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Even pessimistic theorists initially took this consensus for granted. As of 2005, however, this consensus is stretched thin on numerous issues. One of these issues is climate policy. A second section of this paper discusses the stakes in the climate debate, suggesting that this dispute is likely to be a particularly important one. The third section notes that attempts to limit global carbon dioxide emissions raise questions about citizens' relationships to each other and to the state. Historically, such questions have raised issues of principle. These issues have had moral and emotional implications that run far beyond the material issues involved. Many nations, notably the US, have resolved these issues by adopting the political system known as republicanism. A fourth section discusses the concept of a republic and the problems it presents for those who wish to develop an international policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The fifth section notes that a broad, if informal, movement in early 21st century politics directly challenges republicanism. Debates over climate policy have already served to deepen this division. A conclusion sums up the paper's findings and reflects on their implications. Future work in the field of security studies will need to address the potential friction between republican and anti-republican political entities, and this paper highlights one of the forms this friction may take.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas M. Kane, 2007. "Hot Planet, Cold Wars," Energy & Environment, , vol. 18(5), pages 533-548, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:18:y:2007:i:5:p:533-548
    DOI: 10.1260/0958-305X.18.5.533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/0958-305X.18.5.533
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1260/0958-305X.18.5.533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen & Aynsley Kellow, 2002. "International Environmental Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2532.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weidner, Helmut, 2005. "Global equity versus public interest? The case of climate change policy in Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Civil Society and Transnational Networks SP IV 2005-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Thomas Hickmann, 2014. "Science–policy interaction in international environmental politics: an analysis of the ozone regime and the climate regime," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 16(1), pages 21-44, January.
    3. John W. Zillman, 2008. "Australian Participation in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change," Energy & Environment, , vol. 19(1), pages 21-42, January.
    4. Oran Young, 2004. "Institutions and the Growth of Knowledge: Evidence from International Environmental Regimes," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 215-228, June.
    5. K. Ya. Kondratyev, 2004. "Key Aspects of Global Climate Change," Energy & Environment, , vol. 15(3), pages 469-503, July.
    6. Ivan Jankovic, 2008. "The Eco-Industrial Complex in USA — Global Warming and Rent-Seeking Coalitions," Energy & Environment, , vol. 19(7), pages 941-958, December.
    7. K. Ya. Kondratyev & John Surrey & Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, 2003. "Book Review: Taken by Storm. The Troubled Science, Policy and Politics of Global Warming, World energy, technology and climate policy outlook 2030, ‘Nuclear energy and the Kyoto Protocol’," Energy & Environment, , vol. 14(6), pages 905-916, November.
    8. John W. Zillman, 2007. "Some Observations on the IPCC Assessment Process 1988–2007," Energy & Environment, , vol. 18(7), pages 869-891, December.
    9. Aynsley Kellow, 2008. "Australia's Role in International Climate Negotiations: Kyoto and beyond," Energy & Environment, , vol. 19(1), pages 43-54, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:18:y:2007:i:5:p:533-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.