IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v13y2002i1p57-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Russian Methane Emissions: Options for Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm R. Hill

    (Professor of Russian and East European Industrial Studies, Loughborough University Business School, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU UK)

Abstract

This paper provides an account of the estimates of methane (CH4) emissions from the Russian Federation and a description of the technologies which can be used to reduce these emissions. It is similar in approach and methodology to previous publications on Russian carbon dioxide emissions (Hill, 1999; Hill, 2000a; Hill, 2000b), but extends the focus of that research from power generation to the fuels industries. Methane has been chosen for study as it is the next most important greenhouse gas in terms of volume of emissions after carbon dioxide. Although accounting for only 1 per cent of the total tonnage of greenhouse gases emitted from the Russian Federation in 1990 (the base year chosen for consequent comparisons in future years by the Kyoto Protocol), the higher global warming potential of methane compared to carbon dioxide increased its proportion to 18 per cent of the global warming effect of Russian greenhouse gas emissions in 1990. Furthermore, the emissions of methane were far in excess of the remaining major greenhouse gases (namely nitrous oxide [N 2 O], sulphur hexafluoride [SF 6 ], hexafluorocarbons [HFCs] and polyfluorocarbons [PFCs]), which although higher in global warming potential than methane only accounted for some 4 per cent of total Russian greenhouse gas emissions in 1990. The reduction of the emissions of these minor greenhouse gases is restricted to a decrease in the use of mineral fertilisers in the case of N 2 O, or the substitution of hexafluorides and fluorocarbons by other gases. In the case of the reduction of methane emissions, however, a wider range of industries and technologies is involved, and there are also linkages between methane and carbon dioxide reductions.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm R. Hill, 2002. "Russian Methane Emissions: Options for Reduction," Energy & Environment, , vol. 13(1), pages 57-80, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:57-80
    DOI: 10.1260/0958305021501083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/0958305021501083
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1260/0958305021501083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm R. Hill, 1997. "Environment and Technology in the Former USSR," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1255.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Shahgedanova, 2000. "Environment in Transition: Better or Different?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 27(3), pages 325-329, June.
    2. Malcolm R. Hill, 1997. "Energy, Environment and Technology in The Former Ussr: The Case of Fossil-Fuelled Power Stations and Acid Rain Emissions," Energy & Environment, , vol. 8(4), pages 247-267, December.
    3. Jonathan Oldfield, 2000. "Structural Economic Change and the Natural Environment in the Russian Federation," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 77-90.
    4. Malcolm R. Hill, 1999. "Carbon Dioxide Emissions from the Russian Federation — Problems and Choices," Energy & Environment, , vol. 10(1), pages 51-78, January.
    5. Malcolm R Hill, 2000. "Technological Options for the Reduction of Russian Acid Rain and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 27(3), pages 393-410, June.
    6. Malcolm R Hill, 2002. "Russian Power Generation: Between a Rock and a Hard Place?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 29(6), pages 819-839, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:57-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.