IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v13y2002i1p1-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder: A Comparison of ‘Green Power’ Certification Programs in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Jane Patterson
  • Ian H. Rowlands

Abstract

With growing concerns about air quality issues and the continuing restructuring of electricity supply industries world-wide, the prospects for ‘green power’ - that is, environmentally-friendly electricity - are probably better now than they have ever been. What kinds of power are deemed to be ‘green’, however, is the subject of much debate. In an effort to standardise the definition of green power, certification programs are being developed independently by different countries at the national or sub-national level. Effectively, these are the mechanisms by which green power is currently being defined. This article compares the attributes of four certification programs for green power-those in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. The goal is to determine the ways in which these programs are similar, and the extent to which they are different. Though there is no definitive effort to determine which certification program is ‘best’, the key debates surrounding the most contentious parts of green power certification programs are identified and investigated. Accordingly, the policy discussion about the relative merits of different approaches is informed and stimulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Jane Patterson & Ian H. Rowlands, 2002. "Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder: A Comparison of ‘Green Power’ Certification Programs in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States," Energy & Environment, , vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:1-25
    DOI: 10.1260/0958305021501065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/0958305021501065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1260/0958305021501065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:1-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.