IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v12y2001i5-6p499-510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success and Failure of JI and CDM Projects: Forestry

Author

Listed:
  • G.B. Phillips
  • E. Aalders

Abstract

Projects developed under the KP's flexibility mechanisms must address a range of “hard†and “soft†criteria. Hard criteria, which can be derived directly from the text of the relevant articles of the Protocol, include national and international acceptability, additionality, leakage, and sustainable development. Soft criteria relate to the project developer's ability to implement the technical interventions described in the project documentation. Confidence in the project developer's ability to deliver eligible, tradable benefits is essential to success. To gain such confidence, developers must address the key issues of risk and uncertainty in the design of their projects.

Suggested Citation

  • G.B. Phillips & E. Aalders, 2001. "Success and Failure of JI and CDM Projects: Forestry," Energy & Environment, , vol. 12(5-6), pages 499-510, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:12:y:2001:i:5-6:p:499-510
    DOI: 10.1260/0958305011500904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/0958305011500904
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1260/0958305011500904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:12:y:2001:i:5-6:p:499-510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.