IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v46y2025i2p35-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Explain the Huge Differences in Rebound Estimates: A Meta-Regression Analysis of the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Marvin Schütt
  • Anke Jacksohn
  • Tobias Möllney
  • Katrin Rehdanz

Abstract

Rebound effects are commonly defined as the relative gap between the potential and realized savings in resource use following efficiency improvements or sufficiency changes. While a considerable number of studies quantify rebound effects, empirical estimates vary widely. Reliable information on the magnitude of rebound effects is therefore still lacking, despite being essential to devise and adjust, for example, energy efficiency policies accordingly. Here, we present the first meta-regression analysis of microeconomic rebound effects at the household level, using forty-three studies with 1,118 estimates to determine average rebound effects and to explain heterogeneous empirical findings. We find that the total microeconomic rebound is, on average, about 41%–52%. The variance can be explained by differences in the type of data used, the scenario setup, and the specifics of the rebound estimation in the primary studies. Furthermore, we find only small absolute transfer errors, indicating a good predictability of rebound effects using our meta-regression model.

Suggested Citation

  • Marvin Schütt & Anke Jacksohn & Tobias Möllney & Katrin Rehdanz, 2025. "How to Explain the Huge Differences in Rebound Estimates: A Meta-Regression Analysis of the Literature," The Energy Journal, , vol. 46(2), pages 35-66, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:35-66
    DOI: 10.1177/01956574241289004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01956574241289004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/01956574241289004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:35-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.