IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v2y1981i3p33-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Air Quality Implications of a Nuclear Moratorium: An Alternative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Bopp
  • Verne Loose
  • Charles Kolstad
  • Robert Pendley

Abstract

The role of nuclear power in the nation's energy future is and probably will continue to be one of the principal energy policy issues in the United States. Relatively inexpensive coal reserves and escalating costs of light water reactors have eroded a once-large cost advantage enjoyed by nuclear technologies. While the relative cost advantage of nuclear over coal electric power has become a subject of debate, other less concrete issues have surfaced and often overshadow economic arguments. Antinuclear "forces" generally view the technology as the essence of what they consider wrong with modern technological society. Pronuclear "forces" counter that much fear associated with nuclear power derives from the newness of the technology and that the air quality and possible economic gains associated with nuclear power make it the preferable choice for future electricity generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Bopp & Verne Loose & Charles Kolstad & Robert Pendley, 1981. "Air Quality Implications of a Nuclear Moratorium: An Alternative Analysis," The Energy Journal, , vol. 2(3), pages 33-48, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:2:y:1981:i:3:p:33-48
    DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol2-No3-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol2-No3-4
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol2-No3-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Nuclear moratorium; Air quality; US; Coal; Electricity generation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F0 - International Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:2:y:1981:i:3:p:33-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.