IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v11y1990i2p117-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Nuclear Power on the Systematic Risk and Market Value of Electric Utility Common Stock

Author

Listed:
  • Russell J. Fuller
  • George W. Hinman
  • Thomas C. Lowinger

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine whether investors perceive utilities with nuclear plants to be more risky than utilities with no nuclear facilities. Two basic analytical frameworks are used. One approach is to analyze investors’ differential perception of the market-related systematic risk of nuclear utility stocks versus non-nuclear utility stocks. This is done by comparing the betas of nuclear versus non-nuclear utility stocks. The second approach is an econometric treatment of price to book value ratios, using cross-sectional data in the time period 1973 to 1987. For both approaches, the differences in the financial markets’ perception of risk, related to the special events of TMI, Chernobyl and the WPPSS bond default, are analyzed. Based on the crosssectional analysis of P/BV ratios in recent years, we estimate the financial markets valued nuclear power utilities at approximately 20% less than comparable non-nuclear utilities. We estimate that a 3% increase in the allowed rate of return for nuclear utilities (from 13.7% to 16.7% in 1988) would have been necessary to fully offset the discount associated with nuclear power.

Suggested Citation

  • Russell J. Fuller & George W. Hinman & Thomas C. Lowinger, 1990. "The Impact of Nuclear Power on the Systematic Risk and Market Value of Electric Utility Common Stock," The Energy Journal, , vol. 11(2), pages 117-134, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:11:y:1990:i:2:p:117-134
    DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol11-No2-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol11-No2-7
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol11-No2-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:11:y:1990:i:2:p:117-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.