IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v10y1989i1p35-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Policy Forum: An Analysis of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Civilian R &D Budget

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald J. Sutherland

Abstract

The Department of Energy’s R &D budget has experienced major changes in funding during the last two administrations. These changes are explained by administration policies that are based on perceived conditions of market failure. Government funding of R &D can be supported on grounds of externalities, public goods and the absence of national contingency markets. Such funding cannot be justified on grounds of being long-term or high-risk. A portfolio model offers insights as to the appropriate definition of risk, a social discount rate and a balanced portfolio of R &D projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald J. Sutherland, 1989. "Energy Policy Forum: An Analysis of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Civilian R &D Budget," The Energy Journal, , vol. 10(1), pages 35-54, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:10:y:1989:i:1:p:35-54
    DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol10-No1-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol10-No1-5
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol10-No1-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:10:y:1989:i:1:p:35-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.