IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v26y2025i1p115-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Putting the European Parliament's gender exceptionalism to the test: MEPs’ specialisation in masculine and feminine policy domains in parliamentary questions

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Dodeigne

    (Research Institute Transitions, 54501University of Namur, Namur, Belgium)

  • Silvia Erzeel

    (VUB Centre for Democratic Futures, 70493Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium)

  • François Randour

    (Research Institute Transitions, 54501University of Namur, Namur, Belgium)

Abstract

The European Parliament is often presented as a success story regarding women's representation. Yet, recent studies observe gendered patterns in parliamentary behaviour. This article contributes to this scholarship by studying gender differences in MEPs’ parliamentary behaviour on ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ policy domains. Analysing 136,787 parliamentary questions over 25 years (1994–2019), the study reveals moderate gender differences in MEPs’ behaviour. Moreover, gender differences are influenced by seniority and women's numerical presence in the European Parliament's political groups. Gender-stereotypical policy foci are more pronounced among newcomers and disappear for experienced MEPs. In political groups with fewer women, seniority is key for women MEPs seeking engagement in masculine policy domains. Overall, our findings underscore the interplay between gender, seniority, and women's presence in shaping MEPs’ parliamentary behaviour within the European Parliament’s gendered context.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Dodeigne & Silvia Erzeel & François Randour, 2025. "Putting the European Parliament's gender exceptionalism to the test: MEPs’ specialisation in masculine and feminine policy domains in parliamentary questions," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(1), pages 115-144, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:115-144
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165241299115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165241299115
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165241299115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:115-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.