IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v23y2022i4p741-757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ever more soft law? A dataset to compare binding and non-binding EU law across policy areas and over time (2004–2019)

Author

Listed:
  • Bartolomeo Cappellina

    (Centre Emile Durkheim, Sciences Po Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France)

  • Anne Ausfelder

    (Otto Suhr Institute of Political Science, 9166Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany)

  • Adam Eick

    (Otto Suhr Institute of Political Science, 9166Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany)

  • Romain Mespoulet

    (PACTE, 55551Sciences Po Grenoble, Grenoble, France)

  • Miriam Hartlapp

    (Otto Suhr Institute of Political Science, 9166Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany)

  • Sabine Saurugger

    (PACTE, 55551Sciences Po Grenoble, Grenoble, France)

  • Fabien Terpan

    (CESICE, 55551Sciences Po Grenoble, Grenoble, France)

Abstract

What characterizes European Union soft law and what are its implications for the EU multilevel system? What is the proportion of hard and soft law in EU policy? Which types of soft law act are adopted in different policy sectors? This article introduces the conceptual and analytical framework that encompasses the EfSoLaw dataset and explains its methodology, advantages, and limitations. This dataset unites information on thousands of EU hard and soft law acts from seven different policy sectors, drawn from over fifteen years (2004–2019) and from various sources (EUR-Lex, DGs, agencies). We present implementation options of the dataset making it exploitable for other scholars and we propose hypotheses to explain the variation in the adoption of soft law in different policy sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartolomeo Cappellina & Anne Ausfelder & Adam Eick & Romain Mespoulet & Miriam Hartlapp & Sabine Saurugger & Fabien Terpan, 2022. "Ever more soft law? A dataset to compare binding and non-binding EU law across policy areas and over time (2004–2019)," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(4), pages 741-757, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:4:p:741-757
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165221111985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165221111985
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165221111985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:4:p:741-757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.