IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v8y1997i2p293-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Philosophical Foundations of the Wallis Report

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey Carmichael

Abstract

The Wallis Report, adopted by the Government in September of this year, contained a wide-ranging set of reforms that are likely to alter significantly the style and structure of financial regulation in Australia. This survey offers some reflections on the Wallis Report, its key recommendations and the thinking underlying them. The Committee saw market failure as the primary rationale for regulation. Markets fail to produce efficient, competitive outcomes for one or more of the following reasons: anti-competitive behaviour; market misconduct; information asymmetry; and systemic instability. The Committee's recommended reforms were designed to create a regulatory structure that matched the four motives for regulation. This will create a regulatory structure based on regulatory functions rather than institutions. The new structure should be more efficient, less duplicative and better able to cope with the regulatory pressures that are likely to emerge in coming years from on-going technological innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey Carmichael, 1997. "Philosophical Foundations of the Wallis Report," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 8(2), pages 293-307, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:293-307
    DOI: 10.1177/103530469700800207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/103530469700800207
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/103530469700800207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:293-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.