IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v2y1991i1p72-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Change and Involvement at the Workplace: Evidence from the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Roy Green

Abstract

The April national wage decision doubted whether Australia's industrial relations parties as yet possessed the “maturity†to conduct enterprise bargaining. This view is consistent with the traditional role of the Industrial Relations Commission and with the conclusions of the 1985 Hancock Report, which provided the rationale for a permanent regime of centralised wage-fixing in Australia. It is also supported to some degree by the results of the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey, which show that, despite the accumulating pressure for change, most workplaces currently lack the necessary ‘infrastructure’ for bargaining and consultation at enterprise level. In particular, the failure of Australian management to involve workers and unions in change may be seen as a major impediment to further workplace reform. The fundamental question which arises for industrial relations policy is whether to accept the situation as it is and hope for progress through the slow but steady implementation of award restructuring, or whether to provide an external impetus for the development of a workplace infrastructure through the establishment of a new framework for enterprise bargaining combined with legislation to promote information-sharing and consultation at the workplace. The central thrust of this article is that the latter approach will more effectively foster a ‘strategic bargaining’ culture in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Roy Green, 1991. "Change and Involvement at the Workplace: Evidence from the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 2(1), pages 72-88, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:2:y:1991:i:1:p:72-88
    DOI: 10.1177/103530469100200106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/103530469100200106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/103530469100200106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:2:y:1991:i:1:p:72-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.