IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v23y2012i2p7-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gambling with Public Money: An Economic Analysis of National Sports Team Funding

Author

Listed:
  • Heather Mitchell
  • Heath Spong
  • Mark Stewart

Abstract

Many governments across the world provide extensive funding to national sports teams and individual athletes in pursuit of success at international competitions such as the Olympic Games. One factor that motivates governments to fund national sports teams is the potential to exploit the elevation in nationalistic pride that attends international sporting success. Drawing on research in the psychology of sport, this article contends that politicians can access the ‘reflective glow’ of successful athletes for their political benefit. The statistical correlation between government funding and Olympic success is explored using the basic prisoners' dilemma to represent the decisions of two governments competing for sports success. While the analysis is simple, we argue that it sheds some light on recent examples and represents a first step in understanding this complex issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather Mitchell & Heath Spong & Mark Stewart, 2012. "Gambling with Public Money: An Economic Analysis of National Sports Team Funding," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 23(2), pages 7-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:23:y:2012:i:2:p:7-22
    DOI: 10.1177/103530461202300202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/103530461202300202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/103530461202300202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:23:y:2012:i:2:p:7-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.