IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v22y2011i2p55-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimum Labour Standards Enforcement in Australia: Caught in the Crossfire?

Author

Listed:
  • Miles Goodwin
  • Glenda Maconachie

Abstract

The complex transition from convict to free labour influenced state intervention in the employment relationship, and initiated the first minimum labour standards in Australia in 1828. Since then, two principal sets of tensions have affected the enforcement of such standards: tensions between government and employers, and tensions between the major political parties over industrial and economic issues. This article argues that these tensions have resulted in a sustained legacy affecting minimum labour standards' enforcement in Australia. The article outlines broad historical developments and contexts of minimum labour standards' enforcement in Australia since 1828, with more contemporary exploration focusing specifically on enforcement practices and policies in the Australian federal industrial relations jurisdiction. Current enforcement practices are an outcome of this volatile history, and past influences remain strong.

Suggested Citation

  • Miles Goodwin & Glenda Maconachie, 2011. "Minimum Labour Standards Enforcement in Australia: Caught in the Crossfire?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 22(2), pages 55-80, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:22:y:2011:i:2:p:55-80
    DOI: 10.1177/103530461102200204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/103530461102200204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/103530461102200204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:22:y:2011:i:2:p:55-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.