IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v21y2010i2p27-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Incentives to Promote Innovation at Work: A Critical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Dent
  • Colin Fenwick
  • Kirsten Newitt

Abstract

The allocation of any benefit that arises from worker-generated innovation is complicated by the importance of three separate areas of law — employment law, intellectual property law and equity — and the distinction between those types of innovation that attract intellectual property rights and those types that do not (the latter being a category that is often referred to as ‘know-how’). The purpose of this article is to engage with the legal scholarship on the principles that are relevant to innovation. To date, the discussion has focused on two distinct approaches — what may be termed the economic and the fairness perspectives. The former may be seen as a justification for the current regime, while the latter has focused on the perceived needs of workers (in large part in opposition to the employers). Our argument is that these two approaches are both incomplete. In an attempt to get closer to a workable framework for the effective allocation of benefits, we offer a third approach; one that is based on the practices that are central to the employer-worker relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Dent & Colin Fenwick & Kirsten Newitt, 2010. "Legal Incentives to Promote Innovation at Work: A Critical Analysis," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 21(2), pages 27-50, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:21:y:2010:i:2:p:27-50
    DOI: 10.1177/103530461002100204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/103530461002100204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/103530461002100204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:21:y:2010:i:2:p:27-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.