IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v19y2009i2p39-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discretionary Fiscal Policy and Budget Deficits: An ‘Orthodox’ Critique of Current Policy Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Hart

Abstract

A return to discretionary fiscal policy is required in the current economic crisis. Advocacy of deficit spending is consistent with mainstream economic models, whether those relying on traditional textbook analysis or those aligned with the New Neoclassical Synthesis. The notion that deficit budgets are necessarily profligate rests on an outdated theory of public finance that ignores endogenous money. It is the productive capacity of the economy and not the government's extent of taxing its citizens, or borrowing from them, that provides the limit to the use of fiscal policy levers.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Hart, 2009. "Discretionary Fiscal Policy and Budget Deficits: An ‘Orthodox’ Critique of Current Policy Debate," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 19(2), pages 39-58, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:19:y:2009:i:2:p:39-58
    DOI: 10.1177/103530460901900204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/103530460901900204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/103530460901900204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:19:y:2009:i:2:p:39-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.