IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v4y1983i4p519-539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socialist Arguments for Industrial Democracy

Author

Listed:
  • John Street

    (University of East Anglia)

Abstract

This article examines the arguments advanced by socialism to support industrial democracy. Three forms of argument are identified: the efficiency argument, the political argument and the moral argument. The first claims that participation increases industrial efficiency; the second argues that the equivalence of the industrial and political realms provides a case for democracy at work; and the third suggests that there are first principles from which the case for industrial democracy can be derived. The contention of this paper is that the first two arguments do not necessarily support the ends towards which they are directed. The third argument asks us to treat work as an expression of human creativity and as a source of freedom. It is this claim that seems to provide the strongest defence of industrial democracy, despite the obvious problems that accompany it.

Suggested Citation

  • John Street, 1983. "Socialist Arguments for Industrial Democracy," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 4(4), pages 519-539, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:4:y:1983:i:4:p:519-539
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X8344005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X8344005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X8344005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:4:y:1983:i:4:p:519-539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.