IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v43y2022i3p1236-1259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demobilised or dormant? Exploring pro-strike attitudes among employees who have never joined a strike

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Frangi

    (Department of Organization and Human Resources, School of Management, University of Quebec in Montreal, Canada)

  • Muhammad Umar Boodoo

    (Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, UK)

  • Robert Hebdon

    (Faculty of Management, Organizational Behaviour Area, McGill University, Montreal, Canada)

Abstract

The general decline of strikes does not necessarily imply that workers are demobilised. A dormant strike potential can be present. Drawing on strikes as ‘experience goods’, this article sheds light on this point by studying pro-strike attitudes among employees in 24 countries who have never been on strike. The variation in pro-strike attitudes is explained by both contextual (collective bargaining coverage, economic conditions and freedom of rights and liberties) and individual (union membership and confidence in unions, political values and household financial situation) factors. Deeper analyses of three countries highlight the potential impact of specific repertoires of contention developed over time on the formation of pro-strike attitudes. Implications for the labour conflict literature and union strategies are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Frangi & Muhammad Umar Boodoo & Robert Hebdon, 2022. "Demobilised or dormant? Exploring pro-strike attitudes among employees who have never joined a strike," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(3), pages 1236-1259, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:43:y:2022:i:3:p:1236-1259
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X20980059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X20980059
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X20980059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:43:y:2022:i:3:p:1236-1259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.