IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v41y2020i1p167-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confusion and collectivism in the ICT sector: Is FLOSS the answer?

Author

Listed:
  • Abigail Marks

    (Heriot-Watt University, UK)

  • Shiona Chillas

    (University of Saint Andrews, UK)

  • Laura Galloway

    (Heriot-Watt University, UK)

  • Gavin Maclean

    (Edinburgh Napier University, UK)

Abstract

Information and communication technology (ICT) workers rarely join trade unions. This is usually explained by the individualized nature of work. This article examines broader forms of collectivism for these workers, drawing on survey and interview data. The focus is on social class, attitudes towards unions and professional bodies and participation in the broader ICT community – specifically Free, Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS). The findings reveal absence of formal collective frames of reference or organization, yet the creativity, autonomy and initiative central to the identity of ICT workers may offer opportunities for collectivization particularly with regard to participation in FLOSS communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Abigail Marks & Shiona Chillas & Laura Galloway & Gavin Maclean, 2020. "Confusion and collectivism in the ICT sector: Is FLOSS the answer?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(1), pages 167-188, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:41:y:2020:i:1:p:167-188
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X17695441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X17695441
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X17695441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:41:y:2020:i:1:p:167-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.