IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v40y2019i1p132-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour research under coercive authoritarianism: Comparative reflections on fieldwork challenges in China

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Fuchs

    (SOAS University of London, UK)

  • Patricia Fuk-Ying Tse

    (University of Warwick, UK)

  • Xiaojun Feng

    (University of Oxford, UK)

Abstract

This article examines conditions for the conduct of qualitative research on labour and industrial relations in China since the shift to a coercive form of authoritarian governance in 2012. In comparing the experiences of three doctoral students from Europe, Hong Kong and mainland China respectively who conducted fieldwork in China between 2015 and 2017, the article argues that coercive authoritarianism has significantly increased the challenges of fieldwork, resulting in a need for inventive coping strategies. The study highlights a need to establish informal networks and reciprocal trust relationships, and points to the elevated importance of ethical considerations in fieldwork on labour and industrial relations in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Fuchs & Patricia Fuk-Ying Tse & Xiaojun Feng, 2019. "Labour research under coercive authoritarianism: Comparative reflections on fieldwork challenges in China," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 40(1), pages 132-155, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:40:y:2019:i:1:p:132-155
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X18780337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X18780337
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X18780337?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:40:y:2019:i:1:p:132-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.