IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v38y2017i2p271-293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour productivity and innovation performance: The importance of internal labour flexibility practices

Author

Listed:
  • Paul TY Preenen

    (TNO, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, the Netherlands)

  • Robert Vergeer

    (CE Delft, the Netherlands)

  • Karolus Kraan

    (TNO, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, the Netherlands)

  • Steven Dhondt

    (TNO, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, the Netherlands; KU Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

This article develops and examines the idea that internal labour flexibility practices are beneficial for labour productivity and innovation performance of companies. This is tested in two studies using unique company level datasets. In Study 1, results obtained from 377 independent companies revealed that internal labour flexibility practices are positively related to objective labour productivity and its growth in the year following, also when controlled for objective labour productivity and objective external labour flexibility from the year before. In Study 2, results obtained from 4271 companies indicated that internal labour flexibility practices were positively related to product innovation and labour productivity. Findings suggest that internal labour flexibility practices benefit both labour productivity and innovation performance of companies. If innovation and labour productivity are considered key to long-term survival, firms and policymakers should consider internal labour flexibility practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul TY Preenen & Robert Vergeer & Karolus Kraan & Steven Dhondt, 2017. "Labour productivity and innovation performance: The importance of internal labour flexibility practices," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 38(2), pages 271-293, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:38:y:2017:i:2:p:271-293
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X15572836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X15572836
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X15572836?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:38:y:2017:i:2:p:271-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.