IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v32y2011i3p357-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can informal social relations help explain workers’ reactions to managerial interventions? Some case evidence from a study of quality management

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Glover

    (Leicester Business School, De Montfort University, UK, lghum@dmu.ac.uk)

Abstract

This article seeks to address the question of whether workers’ reactions to managerial interventions can be more fully explained when the influence of informal social relations are analysed. Empirical evidence is drawn from detailed case studies that examined workers’ reactions to quality management in British subsidiaries of two multinational companies. Some of the findings appear paradoxical at first sight. For example, workers expressed concerns for quality and customer satisfaction — despite feelings of demoralization and alienation. The analysis of informal relations offers an explanation for these responses. While not overlooking the importance of formal relations, the discussion focuses upon the nature and impact of informal relations (inside and outside the organization) as these have been less well discussed. Furthermore, the importance of linking the workplace with the non-work domain is increasingly being recognized and the concept of social relations can bridge these domains.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Glover, 2011. "Can informal social relations help explain workers’ reactions to managerial interventions? Some case evidence from a study of quality management," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 32(3), pages 357-378, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:32:y:2011:i:3:p:357-378
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X10377810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X10377810
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X10377810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:32:y:2011:i:3:p:357-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.