IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v23y2002i4p491-528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worker Participation and Teams: New Evidence from Analyzing Organizational Ethnographies

Author

Listed:
  • Randy Hodson

    (Ohio State University)

Abstract

Most large organizations are today experimenting with heightened employee involvement, including self-monitoring teams, joint programs with unions and limited degrees of worker ownership such as those based on employee stock ownership programs. In spite of the widespread adoption of such programs, relatively little is known about their consequences for employee behavior and attitudes. In particular, little is known about the relative strengths and limitations of different programs. The current article evaluates a range of programs involving heightened employee involvement using data derived from content coding program characteristics, worker behaviors and worklife experiences from the existing set of book length organizational ethnographies (N = 122). The results suggest that all forms of worker participation offer improved worklife experiences and reduced workplace conflict relative to the absence of these programs. Self-monitoring teams, however, perform no better than joint union-management programs or than more traditional work teams along the dimensions of worker autonomy, pride, satisfaction and cooperation. The sole unique contribution of contemporary self-monitoring teams appears to be a lowering of strike probabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Randy Hodson, 2002. "Worker Participation and Teams: New Evidence from Analyzing Organizational Ethnographies," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 23(4), pages 491-528, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:23:y:2002:i:4:p:491-528
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X02234003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X02234003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X02234003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:23:y:2002:i:4:p:491-528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.