IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v8y1994i4p378-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response to "'Ties that Bind' Reexamined"

Author

Listed:
  • Hank V. Savitch

    (University of Louisville)

  • David Collins

    (University of Louisville)

Abstract

This response notes that the use of statewide measures of growth rates may be problematic in trying to account for suburban growth rates, given the fact that suburbs make up sizable portions of various states' populations. On the other hand, city and suburban growth can be separated by definition, yet are still found to be correlated. The thesis of interdependence between cities and suburbs is found to be valid, in part because consumers act within a regional market. At the same time, this response agrees with Blair and Zhang that more attention should be given to variables that reflect the role of states in metropolitan development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hank V. Savitch & David Collins, 1994. "Response to "'Ties that Bind' Reexamined"," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 8(4), pages 378-380, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:8:y:1994:i:4:p:378-380
    DOI: 10.1177/089124249400800409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124249400800409
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/089124249400800409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael B. Teitz, 1997. "American Planning in the 1990s: Part II, The Dilemma of the Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(5-6), pages 775-795, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:8:y:1994:i:4:p:378-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.