IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v14y2000i3p243-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Subsidies and the Role of Suburbanization in Urban Economic Development: A Reply to Timothy Bates

Author

Listed:
  • Sheryll D. Cashin

    (Georgetown University Law Center)

Abstract

This article commends Professor Bates’s analysis of the Minority Enterprise Small Business Investment Company (MESBIC) program, acknowledging its important object lessons: that size, excellent management talent, and effective cost and risk containment are critical to MESBIC success. I challenge, however, Professor Bates’s implicit indictment of the Clinton administration’s signature community development initiatives. The article argues that such community development investments are justified and should be understood as a small but important component of an overall strategy to connect economically marginal communities and the citizens who live there to the regional economy. More important, this article argues that the next wave of community development strategies sponsored by federal and state government ought to squarely address issues of regional inequity, avoiding subsidization of rapid suburbanization in a manner that exacerbates interjurisdictional disparities of tax-base wealth and of citizen opportunity.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheryll D. Cashin, 2000. "Public Subsidies and the Role of Suburbanization in Urban Economic Development: A Reply to Timothy Bates," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 14(3), pages 243-248, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:14:y:2000:i:3:p:243-248
    DOI: 10.1177/089124240001400302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124240001400302
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/089124240001400302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Bates, 2000. "Financing the Development of Urban Minority Communities: Lessons of History," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 14(3), pages 227-242, August.
    2. Jeremy Nowak, 1997. "Neighborhood Initiative and the Regional Economy," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 11(1), pages 3-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timothy Bates, 2000. "Rejoinder to Sheryll Cashin: Programs as Token Gestures," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 14(3), pages 250-255, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy Bates, 2002. "Rejoinder to Charles D. Tansey: Moving Toward a More Effective Small Business Administration," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 16(2), pages 185-190, May.
    2. Christian Weller, 2010. "Have Differences in Credit Access Diminished in an Era of Financial Market Deregulation?," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(1), pages 1-34.
    3. P. Köllinger & M. Minniti, 2006. "Not for Lack of Trying: American Entrepreneurship in Black and White," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 59-79, August.
    4. Christian Weller, 2009. "Credit Access, the Costs of Credit and Credit Market Discrimination," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 7-28, March.
    5. Manuel Pastor Jr. & Chris Benner & Rachel Rosner, 2003. "An “Option for the Poor†: A Research Audit for Community-Based Regionalism in California's Central Coast," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 17(2), pages 175-192, May.
    6. Peake, Whitney O. & Marshall, Maria I., 2009. "Has the "Farm Problem" Disappeared? A Comparison of Household and Self-Employment Income Levels of the Farm and Nonfarm Self-Employed," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46304, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. John P. Blair & Michael C. Carroll, 2007. "Inner-City Neighborhoods and Metropolitan Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 21(3), pages 263-277, August.
    8. Timothy Bates, 2000. "Rejoinder to Sheryll Cashin: Programs as Token Gestures," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 14(3), pages 250-255, August.
    9. Lois M. Shelton, 2010. "Fighting an Uphill Battle: Expansion Barriers, Intra–Industry Social Stratification, and Minority Firm Growth," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(2), pages 379-398, March.
    10. Valentina Hartarska & Denis Nadolnyak, 2012. "Board size and diversity as governance mechanisms in community development loan funds in the USA," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(33), pages 4313-4329, November.
    11. Richard C. Hula & Marty P. Jordan, 2018. "Private Investment and Public Redevelopment: The Case of New Markets Tax Credits," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 11-38, March.
    12. Xue Zhang & Mildred E. Warner & George C. Homsy, 2017. "Environment, Equity, and Economic Development Goals: Understanding Differences in Local Economic Development Strategies," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 31(3), pages 196-209, August.
    13. Edward W. Hill, 1998. "Principles for Rethinking the Federal Government's Role in Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 12(4), pages 299-312, November.
    14. Christian E. Weller & Amy Helburn, 2009. "Public Policy Options to Build Wealth for America’s Middle Class," Working Papers wp210, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    15. Timothy Bates & Alicia Robb, 2013. "Greater Access to Capital Is Needed to Unleash the Local Economic Development Potential of Minority-Owned Businesses," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 27(3), pages 250-259, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:14:y:2000:i:3:p:243-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.