IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v13y1999i1p55-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Directing Benefits to Need: Evaluating the Distributive Consequences of Urban Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Jill L. Tao

    (University of Oklahoma)

  • Richard C. Feiock

    (Florida State University)

Abstract

Evaluation of targeted development programs is made difficult by undefined or multiple goals, reliance on inappropriate aggregate units and levels for analysis, and neglect of distributional consequences resulting from development policy choices. This article presents a strategy for evaluating intergovernmental development programs that are targeted to areas of need and applies this approach to two separate state-sponsored economic development programs in Florida communities. The empirical analysis identifies factors that account for cities’ choices to use targeted development programs and the policy instruments used to achieve targeted outcomes. It then assesses the consequences of two of these policy instruments for both economic growth and community development. In doing so, the authors identify the consequences that problem definition and level of analysis choices have for the outcomes of evaluation efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill L. Tao & Richard C. Feiock, 1999. "Directing Benefits to Need: Evaluating the Distributive Consequences of Urban Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 13(1), pages 55-65, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:55-65
    DOI: 10.1177/089124249901300108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124249901300108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/089124249901300108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy J. Bartik, 1991. "Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number wbsle.
    2. Timothy J. Bartik, "undated". "Better Evaluation is Needed for Economic Development Programs to Survive," Upjohn Working Papers tjb1994edq, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    3. Timothy J. Bartik, 1994. "Better Evaluation Is Needed for Economic Development Programs to Thrive," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 8(2), pages 99-106, May.
    4. Donald N. Baum, 1987. "The Economic Effects of State and Local Business Incentives," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 63(4), pages 348-360.
    5. Laura A. Reese & David Fasenfest, 1997. "What Works Best?: Values and the Evaluation of Local Economic Development Policy," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 11(3), pages 195-207, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charlie Karlsson, 2012. "Entrepreneurship, social capital, governance and regional economic development: an introduction," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Roger R. Stough (ed.), Entrepreneurship, Social Capital and Governance, chapter 1, pages 1-26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Karlsson, Charlie & Rouchy, Philippe, 2015. "Regional Economic Development, Social Capital and Governance: A Buchanian Approach," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 390, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Terry F. Buss, 2001. "The Effect of State Tax Incentives on Economic Growth and Firm Location Decisions: An Overview of the Literature," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 15(1), pages 90-105, February.
    2. Darin Wohlgemuth & Maureen Kilkenny, 1998. "Firm Relocation Threats and Copy Cat Costs," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 21(2), pages 139-162, August.
    3. Bill Farley, 2020. "Self-Report Accuracy in Local Economic Development Programs," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 34(4), pages 315-324, November.
    4. Ed McMullan & James J. Chrisman & Karl Vesper, 2001. "Some Problems in Using Subjective Measures of Effectiveness to Evaluate Entrepreneurial Assistance Programs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 26(1), pages 37-54, October.
    5. Terry F. Buss, 1999. "The Case Against Targeted Industry Strategies," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 13(4), pages 339-356, November.
    6. Andrew M. Isserman, 1993. "State Economic Development Policy and Practice in the United States: A Survey Article," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 16(1-2), pages 49-100, April.
    7. Ted K. Bradshaw, 2002. "The Contribution of Small Business Loan Guarantees to Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 16(4), pages 360-369, November.
    8. Chrisman, James J. & McMullan, Ed & Hall, Jeremy, 2005. "The influence of guided preparation on the long-term performance of new ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 769-791, November.
    9. Mustafa Dinc & Kingsley E. Haynes, 1999. "Regional Efficiency in the Manufacturing Sector: Integrated Shift-Share and Data Envelopment Analysis," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 13(2), pages 183-199, May.
    10. Joy Bhadury & H. Eiselt, 2012. "Optimizing subsidies for the location of distribution centers," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 48(1), pages 247-261, February.
    11. Maria Figueroa-Armijos & Thomas G. Johnson, 2016. "Entrepreneurship policy and economic growth: Solution or delusion? Evidence from a state initiative," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1033-1047, December.
    12. Brad R. Watts & George A. Erickcek & Jacob Duritsky & Kevin O’Brien & Claudette Robey & Jim Robey, 2009. "What Should EDA Fund? Developing a Model for Pre-Assessment of Economic Development Investments," Upjohn Working Papers 09-155, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    13. Brad R. Watts & George A. Erickcek & Jacob Duritsky & Kevin O'Brien & Claudette Robey & James Robey, 2011. "What Should EDA Fund? Developing a Model for Preassessment of Economic Development Investments," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 25(1), pages 65-78, February.
    14. James J. Chrisman, 1997. "Program Evaluation and the Venture Development Program at the University of Calgary: A Research Note," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(1), pages 59-73, October.
    15. James J. Chrisman & Elizabeth Gatewood & Leo B. Donlevy, 2002. "A Note on the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Outsider Assistance Programs in Rural versus Non-Rural States," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 26(3), pages 67-80, April.
    16. Rhonda Phillips, 2002. "Note: Evaluating Community Economic Development Planning Programs with a Small Number of Participants: A Non‐Parametric Approach," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 497-512, September.
    17. Leah Platt Boustan & Matthew E. Kahn & Paul W. Rhode, 2012. "Moving to Higher Ground: Migration Response to Natural Disasters in the Early Twentieth Century," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(3), pages 238-244, May.
    18. Crown, Daniel & Faggian, Alessandra & Corcoran, Jonathan, 2020. "Foreign-Born graduates and innovation: Evidence from an Australian skilled visa program✰,✰✰,★,★★," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(9).
    19. Colas, Mark & Saulnier, Emmett, 2023. "Vertical migration externalities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    20. Fang, Mingyue & Nie, Huihua & Shen, Xinyi, 2023. "Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:55-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.