IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v10y1996i1p91-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interindustry Covariance Patterns: Too Unstable for Portfolio Variance Analysis to be a Useful Tool?

Author

Listed:
  • James A. Kurre

    (Pennsylvania State University at Erie)

  • Barry R. Weller

    (Pennsylvania State University at Erie)

Abstract

Instability in the local economy has long been a problem that local policy makers have sought to remedy, typically through diversification of the industrial base. Since the mid-1970s, portfolio variance analysis has held promise as a tool to assist regional policymakers in selecting target industries that would help stabilize the local cycle. However, this approach typically makes use of patterns in historical data to identify stabilizing industries, involving the implicit—and fundamental—assumption that past interindustry patterns will continue. This article investigates that basic assumption through examination of the interindustry patterns of one local economy, in the monthly employment data for 14 industries over a 34-year period

Suggested Citation

  • James A. Kurre & Barry R. Weller, 1996. "Interindustry Covariance Patterns: Too Unstable for Portfolio Variance Analysis to be a Useful Tool?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 10(1), pages 91-103, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:10:y:1996:i:1:p:91-103
    DOI: 10.1177/089124249601000110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124249601000110
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/089124249601000110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:10:y:1996:i:1:p:91-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.