IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v21y2004i2p85-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiparty Disputes and the Probability of War, 1816—1992

Author

Listed:
  • Karen K. Petersen

    (Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee, USA, k.petersen@vanderbilt.edu)

  • John A. Vasquez

    (Colgate University Hamilton, New York, USA)

  • Yijia Wang

    (Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee, USA)

Abstract

Previous theory and research have suggested that multiparty disputes might be significantly more likely to escalate to war than bilateral disputes, because of the difficulty of reaching a mutually acceptable agreement as the number of parties increases. This study presents a systematic test of this hypothesis. Efforts to provide such a test have been hampered by the absence of data that distinguish the number of participants in a militarized interstate dispute prior to the outbreak of war from the number of participants after the war breaks out. We find that multiparty disputes do have an increased probability to escalate to war. In addition, we find that the issue over which the disputants contend has an important effect on the probability that the dispute will escalate to war; multiparty disputes that are over territory have a higher probability of escalating to war than multiparty disputes in general. Lastly, it is found that the effects related to the number of parties in a dispute and to whether the dispute is over territory are independent, and one does not eliminate the effect of the other. In order to contribute to future scholarship on this topic, the data for the new classification scheme of multiparty disputes are published in the appendices.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen K. Petersen & John A. Vasquez & Yijia Wang, 2004. "Multiparty Disputes and the Probability of War, 1816—1992," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(2), pages 85-100, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:21:y:2004:i:2:p:85-100
    DOI: 10.1080/07388940490463898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/07388940490463898
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07388940490463898?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:21:y:2004:i:2:p:85-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.