IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v8y1999i1p26-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Typology of Consumers of Institutional Respite Care

Author

Listed:
  • Tish Smyer

    (College of Nursing, South Dakota State University)

  • Betty L. Chang

    (School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles)

Abstract

In this descriptive ethnography, a typology of consumers of institutional respite care and phases of respite care were formulated from the data collected over a 1-year period at a 24-bed hospital-based skilled nursing facility in the western United States. The sample was drawn from facility billing records, which verified the type of care under the term respite care. Using anthropological fieldwork methods, data were obtained from 14 caregiving dyads plus two care recipients who did not have family caregivers. The identified caregiver categories were depletion, maintenance, caregiver surgery or illness, and no available family caregiver. Phases of respite care provided information regarding the caregivers’ experience in the process of decision making, transitioning to time away from the care recipient, and postrespite adjustment. This model has implications for the structure and process of respite care design and decision making. This may provide a promising avenue in the respite care research arena.

Suggested Citation

  • Tish Smyer & Betty L. Chang, 1999. "A Typology of Consumers of Institutional Respite Care," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 8(1), pages 26-50, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:8:y:1999:i:1:p:26-50
    DOI: 10.1177/10547739922158133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547739922158133
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547739922158133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:8:y:1999:i:1:p:26-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.