IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v5y1996i2p237-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective Appraisal of Infant Crying

Author

Listed:
  • M. Ruth Elliott

    (University of Alberta)

  • Jane Drummond

    (University of Alberta)

  • Kathryn E. Barnard

    (University of Washington)

Abstract

How families appraise difficult situations contributes to later adaptive functioning. We have observed in both research and practice that when appraising their infants' crying, mothers often compared their own infants' crying to actual or supposed much worse infants. They typically appraised their infants to be crying less than average infants. This phenomenon defined in the social psychology literature, is called downward comparison. Secondary analysts of an established data set was used to assess the extent of downward comparison and the identification of excessive crying among a sample of 193 primiparous mothers. Mothers appraised their own infants' crying to be less than that of the expected average infant. Mothers who identified their infants as excessive criers made less robust downward comparisons than did mothers who did not identify their infants as excessive criers. Nursing interventions that focus on supporting mothers' positive appraisal and promoting knowledge of infant behaviors, particularly infant crying, are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Ruth Elliott & Jane Drummond & Kathryn E. Barnard, 1996. "Subjective Appraisal of Infant Crying," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 5(2), pages 237-250, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:5:y:1996:i:2:p:237-250
    DOI: 10.1177/105477389600500209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105477389600500209
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/105477389600500209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:5:y:1996:i:2:p:237-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.