IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v4y1995i4p425-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Focus Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Linda M. Janelli

    (State University of New York at Buffalo)

  • Suzanne S. Dickerson

    (State University of New York at Buffalo)

  • Marlene R. Ventura

    (State University of New York at Buffalo)

Abstract

A phenomenological approach was used to examine nursing staffs experiences using physical restraints. A total of 12 nurses from a tertiary hospital participated in one of three focus groups. Exploring the attitudes of nurses can contribute to a better understanding of how decisions are made concerning restraints. An analysis of the focus group data resulted in a description of the lived experiences of nurses using restraints. Seven themes emerged from the data, one of which reflected that the nurses felt ambiguous about restraints, yet they made judgments and justified their decisions after assessing patient characteristics, environmental safety, and unit traditions. Nurse clinicians could use the focus group method to sensitize themselves to the staffs needs and to allow staff the opportunity to share ideas and to dispel misconceptions about restraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda M. Janelli & Suzanne S. Dickerson & Marlene R. Ventura, 1995. "Focus Groups," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 4(4), pages 425-441, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:4:y:1995:i:4:p:425-441
    DOI: 10.1177/105477389500400408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105477389500400408
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/105477389500400408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lofgren, R.P. & MacPherson, D.S. & Granieri, R. & Myllenbeck, S. & Sprafka, J.M., 1989. "Mechanical restraints on the medical wards: Are protective devices safe?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 79(6), pages 735-738.
    2. Phillips, C.D. & Hawes, C. & Fries, B.E., 1993. "Reducing the use of physical restraints in nursing homes: Will it increase costs?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(3), pages 342-348.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victoria Schirm & Marjorie Gray & Marlene Peoples, 1993. "Nursing Personnel's Perceptions of Physical Restraint Use in Long-Term Care," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 2(1), pages 98-110, February.
    2. Eun‐Hi Kong & Heeseung Choi & Lois K Evans, 2017. "Staff perceptions of barriers to physical restraint‐reduction in long‐term care: a meta‐synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 49-60, January.
    3. John Bowblis & Judith Lucas, 2012. "The impact of state regulations on nursing home care practices," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 52-72, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:4:y:1995:i:4:p:425-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.