Author
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of two bedside capillary blood glucose monitors that were being considered for purchase for an adult outpatient clinic. Particapants were 101 patients 18 years or older with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus who were attending medical service outpatient clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups for bedside glucose measurement. Clinic nurses trained for the study did the bedside glucose readings and all venous blood samples were analyzed in the hospital's clinical laboratory. Results of t tests indicate a statistically significant difference between the bedside capillary and venous glucose levels for the total sample (p ≤ 0.001). The difference between bedside capillary glucose and venous glucose within monitor groups for bedside capillary glucose and venous glucose was also statistically significant (p ≤ 0.001) for both groups. The mean percentage difference between the venous (reference) readings and bedside capillary glucose reading was 8.3% for the Ace-Easy and 12.4% for the Glucometer Encore. This between-monitor group percentage difference was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.001). Regression equations generated from patient data then used to predict venous glucose values from bedside capillary glucose values indicate variability in the accuracy of the monitors, especially in the higher ranges, which could result in under treatment of hyperglycemia.
Suggested Citation
Jane Goff & Barbara P. Rogers, 1995.
"Selecting a Bedside Glucose Monitor for Outpatient Clinics,"
Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 4(1), pages 105-113, February.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:clnure:v:4:y:1995:i:1:p:105-113
DOI: 10.1177/105477389500400109
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:4:y:1995:i:1:p:105-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.