IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v33y2024i7p581-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Philosophical Tools in Nursing Research

Author

Listed:
  • Keith A. Meadows

Abstract

The objective of this article is to illustrate the importance of the role philosophy and its tools play in the designing and undertaking of nursing research and its importance to be understood by the practicing researcher to ensure the selected methodology and the tools used provide the framework for obtaining reliable and valid answers to their research questions. The article discusses the three major paradigms (Positivism, Interpretivism, and Pragmatism) which have characterized much of health-related research together with a set of essential and practical tools with no metaphysical assumptions that will hopefully provide an explicit framework and a nomenclature which can be applied as we proceed through the research process.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith A. Meadows, 2024. "The Role of Philosophical Tools in Nursing Research," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 33(7), pages 581-588, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:33:y:2024:i:7:p:581-588
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738241267159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738241267159
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738241267159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hye-Young Jang & Jeong-Eun Yang & Yong-Soon Shin, 2022. "A Phenomenological Study of Nurses’ Experience in Caring for COVID-19 Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Keith Meadows, 2024. "Phenomenology: A Method for the Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 33(4), pages 262-270, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:33:y:2024:i:7:p:581-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.