IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v32y2023i7p1041-1045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of PROMIS Measures to Assess Fatigue and Sleep Symptom Severity Among African American Patients Newly Diagnosed With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas A. Giordano
  • Francisco J. Pasquel
  • Victoria Pak
  • Ann E. Rogers
  • Selma Selimovic
  • Jordan Pelkmans
  • Andrew H. Miller

Abstract

This pilot study examined the concurrent validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Short Form, measures with the longer Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory among patients living with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A total of 26 African American patients living with prediabetes and newly diagnosed with OSA completed the six-item short form versions of PROMIS Fatigue and PROMIS Sleep Disturbance, and the longer 20-item Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. Both PROMIS Fatigue and Sleep Disturbance scales demonstrated high reliability with Cronbach’s α of .91 and .92, respectively. PROMIS Fatigue scores were significantly correlated with Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory scores ( r s  = .53; p  = .006) and demonstrated concurrent validity. However, PROMIS Sleep Disturbance scores and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory scores were not associated with one another. The brief PROMIS Fatigue scale is a useful, succinct approach to assess fatigue severity among diverse patient populations living with OSA. This study is among the first to evaluate the performance of PROMIS Fatigue in a sample living with OSA.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas A. Giordano & Francisco J. Pasquel & Victoria Pak & Ann E. Rogers & Selma Selimovic & Jordan Pelkmans & Andrew H. Miller, 2023. "Performance of PROMIS Measures to Assess Fatigue and Sleep Symptom Severity Among African American Patients Newly Diagnosed With Obstructive Sleep Apnea," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(7), pages 1041-1045, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:32:y:2023:i:7:p:1041-1045
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738231182550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738231182550
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738231182550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:32:y:2023:i:7:p:1041-1045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.