IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v30y2021i6p724-733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Video-Based Information Provision Using a Smart Pad on Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow Biopsy

Author

Listed:
  • Seung Hee Lee
  • Chul-Gyu Kim
  • Hye Sook Han
  • Jihyun Kwon
  • So Youen Roh
  • Beom Jin Shin

Abstract

The purpose is to determine the effect of video-based information provision using a smart pad on uncertainty, anxiety, physiological parameters, pain, and educational satisfaction among patients hospitalized for a bone marrow biopsy. This study was done with a pre-/posttest nonequivalent control group design. The subjects were 65 patients in the hematology-oncology ward of a university hospital in Cheongju, South Korea, who underwent a bone marrow biopsy between August 2017 and May 2018. Thirty volunteers were allocated to the control group and 35 volunteers to the intervention group. The experimental group showed significantly lower uncertainty and significantly greater satisfaction with education than did the control group. No significant difference was observed in anxiety, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse, and pain. Video-based information provision using a smart pad was effective for lowering uncertainty among patients receiving a bone marrow biopsy, as well as for boosting their sense of educational satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Seung Hee Lee & Chul-Gyu Kim & Hye Sook Han & Jihyun Kwon & So Youen Roh & Beom Jin Shin, 2021. "Effects of Video-Based Information Provision Using a Smart Pad on Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow Biopsy," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(6), pages 724-733, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:30:y:2021:i:6:p:724-733
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773820905083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773820905083
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773820905083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chou‐Ping Chiou & Yun‐Chen Chung, 2012. "Effectiveness of multimedia interactive patient education on knowledge, uncertainty and decision‐making in patients with end‐stage renal disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(9‐10), pages 1223-1231, May.
    2. Ka‐Lai Wu & Su‐Ru Chen & Wen‐Chin Ko & Shu‐Yu Kuo & Ping‐Ling Chen & Hui‐Fang Su & Wen‐Yin Chang, 2014. "The effectiveness of an accessibility‐enhanced multimedia informational educational programme in reducing anxiety and increasing satisfaction of patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(13-14), pages 2063-2073, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding Yi Ng & Lorraine Tudor Car & Marcus Jia Ming Ng & Junde Lu & Joelle Leung & Tiong Thye Goo & Clement Luck Khng Chia, 2021. "Identifying barriers to early presentation in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) in Northern Singapore: Qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-10, May.
    2. Nien‐Hsin Chen & Yu‐Ping Lin & Shu‐Yuan Liang & Heng‐Hsin Tung & Shiow‐Luan Tsay & Tsae‐Jyy Wang, 2018. "Conflict when making decisions about dialysis modality," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 138-146, January.
    3. Maria Margarita Becerra Pérez & Matthew Menear & Jamie C. Brehaut & France Légaré, 2016. "Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret about Health Care Decisions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 36(6), pages 777-790, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:30:y:2021:i:6:p:724-733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.