IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v30y2021i2p193-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning Needs of Iranian Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Cross-sectional, Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hadi Hassankhani
  • Hamidreza Haririan
  • Arezoo Jafari
  • Joanne E. Porter
  • Frances O’Brien
  • Hossein Feizollahzadeh

Abstract

Background: Patient education requires modification as it is either nonexistent or implemented irregularly or inadequately. Study’s purpose: To examine the learning needs of patients with coronary heart disease from the perspective of the patients, their relatives, and health care providers. Methodology: The cross-sectional, comparative study conducted at two cardiac hospitals of Tabriz and Ardebil, Iran from May 2016 to September 2016.Through convenience sampling perceptions of 137 patients, 137 relatives, 33 cardiologists, and 108 nurses were compared using the Cardiac Learning Need Inventory questionnaire. Major results: The most important learning needs of patients from the perspective of physicians, nurses, and patients’ relatives was information about risk factors. In contrast, patient’s perceived information about medication to be their most important learning need. Clinical implications: Patients’ perceptions of their educational needs was different from the perceptions of physicians, nurses, and relatives of the patients. Therefore, when planning patient education a comprehensive review of the patients’ learning needs is required in order to develop a suitable education plan by prioritizing patients’ educational needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadi Hassankhani & Hamidreza Haririan & Arezoo Jafari & Joanne E. Porter & Frances O’Brien & Hossein Feizollahzadeh, 2021. "Learning Needs of Iranian Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Cross-sectional, Comparative Study," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(2), pages 193-199, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:193-199
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773819898808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773819898808
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773819898808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:193-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.